← Back to R&D
Reliability

Why We Validate Before We Trust Anything an AI Wrote

Hacroo Technologies · 4 min read

Generation grounded in real schemas is still generation — it can still produce a workflow with an orphaned node, a credential field left empty, or a connection wired by id instead of by name. We don't ask a second AI call to "check if this looks right." We run a deterministic validator: connection reachability from every trigger, credential structure per node type, casing correctness, and AI-node-specific requirements like a language model actually being attached to an agent.

A second AI opinion
  • Can hallucinate too — no guaranteed catch
  • Slower and costs another model call
  • Non-deterministic — same input, different verdicts
Deterministic validator
  • Checks reachability, credentials, casing — instantly
  • Same input always gives the same result
  • Free to run, no model call required

Why deterministic, not another AI call

Deterministic checks catch what they catch instantly and for free, with no risk of the checker hallucinating too. A second AI call reviewing the first is still guessing — just with extra steps.

Where AI still belongs in the loop

Only genuinely ambiguous or content-dependent problems — an empty message body, a vague field — go to an LLM to fix, and only after the deterministic pass has done everything it reliably can. This ordering matters: cheap, certain checks first, expensive, probabilistic ones only when genuinely needed.

More R&D

Want to see this working, not just described?